Please enable javascript to view this page in its intended format.
|
Criteria |
Marginal |
Satisfactory |
Very Good |
Excellent |
|
Identifying the context, issue or concern |
Issue lacks strong connections to improving quality of student learning |
Issue arises directly from candidate’s experiences but link to students’ learning is less clear |
Issue or concern is clearly related to candidate’s experiences and students’ needs |
Issue or concern extends beyond the immediate situation and has implications for use in other classrooms |
|
Data collection and analysis |
Minimal data poorly analyzed |
Adequate data with an ordinary analysis |
Interesting data with thoughtful analysis |
Extensive and relevant data carefully analyzed |
|
New teaching practices and plans for changing your practice |
No new practices or plans indicated |
New practices and plans identified but not well developed |
New practices are explained well but limited in range |
Strong list of new approaches to teaching |
|
Review of related literature/resources |
Literature is not clearly related to the data or issue |
Literature is relevant but limited in perspective |
At least 3 good resources that connect to concerns & data |
Many excellent resources clearly linked to data |
|
Professional growth and messages for first year of teaching |
Little indication of professional growth |
Some evidence of growth |
Good growth and future planning |
Strong evidence of growth and insights for the future |
|
Presentation |
Poor quality, numerous misspellings |
Acceptable quality |
Good quality, only a few errors |
Very high quality |