Please enable javascript to view this page in its intended format.
CHART 4 shows the Action Research projects carried out between late September and late November, 1997, by Christian, Rob, and Michelle (Christian's project, which also appears in Chart 2, is repeated here to provide three projects in each chart). The chart has 10 rows, beginning with two rows of "descriptive information." The remaining 8 rows are intended to illustrate the possible development of an action research project.
We hope that the presentation of three projects at once will facilitate comparisons and an understanding of the diversity and flexibility of learning about one's teaching through action research.
|
|
Christian |
Rob |
Michelle |
|
Roles |
Part time M.Ed. Full time teacher |
Full time M.Ed. |
Full time M.Ed. |
|
Curriculum Area |
Intermediate Division (all subjects) |
Junior girls basketball |
University course in Leisure Studies and Recreation |
|
Starting Point |
To reduce the piles of student work waiting to be marked, I realized that assignments handed back quickly might have a beneficial impact on the student’s learning. |
Identify how Ms. X, as coach, could improve her team’s performance through use of mental imagery techniques. Rob is critical friend to assist Ms. X. |
Questioning her practices and methods as course instructor Previous students reported that this course was very effective in their learning. Professor wants to discover WHAT made that learning happen. |
|
Further Questions |
|
|
|
|
Breakthrough |
|
|
|
|
New Practices |
Marking assignments is placed on top of my work priority list. |
Surveys indicated increased confidence in shooting ability. 94% of players reported mental imagery helps. |
|
|
Data |
|
Ms. X felt having the chance to discuss the technique with her students gave her more personal rapport with team and improved communication. Students had more chance to think about the game when not on the court. |
|
|
Findings New Knowledge |
|
Gains in team’s shooting performance cannot be attributed solely to mental imagery. As novice players it is impossible to isolate the skill development. Focus changed from interest solely on improvement of skill to effect of technique on players’ confidence to shoot more often in games. |
Grading / evaluation skill in progress. LEAD showed no significant changes in dominant leadership style but there was a significant change in flexibility between styles demonstrating that the students were significantly more flexible in adjusting their style. |
|
Validation |
|
Discussions with action research classmates. Discussions between Rob and Ms. X. Follow-up questionnaires to be given to the students. |
LEAD has validation checks built in to test for internal validity between items Compare assignments to each other and to questionnaire for validation Check with students. |
|
Next Steps |
To continue this practice and collect more data. |
How else can Ms. X improve team’s shooting? How will Ms. X improve use of this technique with her team next year? How important is winning to the students? to Ms. X? |
|